Liu Q, Lu JP, Wang F, Wang L, Tian JM.
Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital/2nd Military Med University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China. zzliuk@online.sh.cn
Radiographics. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):1311-21.
Aortic dissection is a catastrophic aortic disorder with high morbidity and mortality rates. Prognosis and treatment vary with different types of aortic dissection; therefore, prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential. Ultrasonography is widely available and can be used even in relatively unstable patients. However, it has limited diagnostic accuracy and cannot provide three-dimensional (3D) display images for treatment planning. Both computed tomographic (CT) angiography and 3D contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography can accurately demonstrate aortic dissection, with CT having the advantages of wider availability and shorter imaging times. However, contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more suitable in medically stable patients, does not involve nephrotoxic contrast agent or ionizing radiation, and offers greater ease and speed of postprocessing. In clinical practice, contrast-enhanced MR angiography can provide high-quality imaging data suitable for 3D reconstructions. It also has excellent spatial and contrast resolution and allows studies to be performed in multiple vascular phases, making it valuable for the diagnosis and classification of aortic dissection and in providing information that is helpful for treatment planning. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with postprocessing is a fast, accurate, and noninvasive technique that may prove to be the optimal imaging modality in medically stable patients with aortic dissection. (c) RSNA, 2007.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference