Connecting Radiology | Enabling collaboration and professional development
Swelling at the angle of the mandible: imaging of the pediatric parotid gland and periparotid region.
Lowe LH, Stokes LS, Johnson JE, Heller RM, Royal SA, Wushensky C, Hernanz-Schulman M.
Department of Radiology, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. llowe@cmh.edu
Radiographics. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):1211-27.
The pediatric parotid gland and periparotid region are subject to a variety of lesions and are most often evaluated with ultrasonography (US), contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. US may be used to assess the size of the parotid gland, distinguish diffuse from focal disease, assess vascularity and adjacent vascular structures, distinguish cystic from solid lesions, and guide fine-needle aspiration. However, further evaluation with CT or MR imaging may be needed to better define the nature and extent of disease. CT is the imaging modality of choice for most pediatric parotid disease (including acute inflammation, abscess, calculi, and major salivary duct obstruction) and most solid masses and may obviate sedation. However, a mass associated with facial nerve symptoms should be evaluated with MR imaging because it is the only modality that can consistently demonstrate the facial nerve. Findings at US, CT, and MR imaging allow localization of parotid lesions and may suggest a specific cause. Clinical information, familiarity with normal parotid anatomy at various stages of its development, and knowledge of the imaging characteristics of parotid and periparotid lesions are essential for appropriate radiologic evaluation. This information can be used to guide therapy and plan a surgical approach.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Department of Radiology, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. llowe@cmh.edu
Radiographics. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):1211-27.
The pediatric parotid gland and periparotid region are subject to a variety of lesions and are most often evaluated with ultrasonography (US), contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. US may be used to assess the size of the parotid gland, distinguish diffuse from focal disease, assess vascularity and adjacent vascular structures, distinguish cystic from solid lesions, and guide fine-needle aspiration. However, further evaluation with CT or MR imaging may be needed to better define the nature and extent of disease. CT is the imaging modality of choice for most pediatric parotid disease (including acute inflammation, abscess, calculi, and major salivary duct obstruction) and most solid masses and may obviate sedation. However, a mass associated with facial nerve symptoms should be evaluated with MR imaging because it is the only modality that can consistently demonstrate the facial nerve. Findings at US, CT, and MR imaging allow localization of parotid lesions and may suggest a specific cause. Clinical information, familiarity with normal parotid anatomy at various stages of its development, and knowledge of the imaging characteristics of parotid and periparotid lesions are essential for appropriate radiologic evaluation. This information can be used to guide therapy and plan a surgical approach.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Views: 1
© 2024 Created by radRounds Radiology Network.
Powered by
