Connecting Radiology | Enabling collaboration and professional development
Soft-tissue venous malformations in adult patients: imaging and therapeutic issues.
Dubois J, Soulez G, Oliva VL, Berthiaume MJ, Lapierre C, Therasse E.
Department of Radiology, Ste-Justine Hospital, 3175 Côte Ste-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1C5. joseedubois@compuserve.com
Radiographics. 2001 Nov-Dec;21(6):1519-31
Venous malformations are the most common vascular malformations. However, confusion with respect to terminology and imaging guidelines continues to result in improper diagnosis and treatment. An appropriate classification scheme for vascular anomalies is important to avoid the use of false generic terms. Adequate imaging in association with clinical findings is crucial to establishing the correct diagnosis. Doppler ultrasonography should be the initial imaging modality and demonstrates absence of flow or low-velocity venous flow. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are used primarily for pretreatment evaluation of lesion extension. These lesions are usually hypointense on T1-weighted MR images and markedly hyperintense on T2-weighted images with variable gadolinium enhancement. Direct phlebography helps confirm the diagnosis and exclude other soft-tissue tumors. Three distinct phlebographic patterns (cavitary, spongy, dysmorphic) have been identified. In most cases, conservative treatment is recommended. Sclerotherapy with or without surgery is useful in cases of functional impairment or significant aesthetic prejudice, even if recurrences are frequent. Direct phlebography is performed when a more detailed assessment of the vascular pattern is needed or as part of sclerotherapy. Use of the appropriate imaging technique is critical in establishing the diagnosis, evaluating extension, and planning appropriate treatment.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Department of Radiology, Ste-Justine Hospital, 3175 Côte Ste-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1C5. joseedubois@compuserve.com
Radiographics. 2001 Nov-Dec;21(6):1519-31
Venous malformations are the most common vascular malformations. However, confusion with respect to terminology and imaging guidelines continues to result in improper diagnosis and treatment. An appropriate classification scheme for vascular anomalies is important to avoid the use of false generic terms. Adequate imaging in association with clinical findings is crucial to establishing the correct diagnosis. Doppler ultrasonography should be the initial imaging modality and demonstrates absence of flow or low-velocity venous flow. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are used primarily for pretreatment evaluation of lesion extension. These lesions are usually hypointense on T1-weighted MR images and markedly hyperintense on T2-weighted images with variable gadolinium enhancement. Direct phlebography helps confirm the diagnosis and exclude other soft-tissue tumors. Three distinct phlebographic patterns (cavitary, spongy, dysmorphic) have been identified. In most cases, conservative treatment is recommended. Sclerotherapy with or without surgery is useful in cases of functional impairment or significant aesthetic prejudice, even if recurrences are frequent. Direct phlebography is performed when a more detailed assessment of the vascular pattern is needed or as part of sclerotherapy. Use of the appropriate imaging technique is critical in establishing the diagnosis, evaluating extension, and planning appropriate treatment.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Views: 0
© 2024 Created by radRounds Radiology Network.
Powered by
