radRounds Radiology Network

Connecting Radiology | Enabling collaboration and professional development

Sorenson JA.

J Nucl Med. 1976 Feb;17(02):137-41.

Three different methods of correcting for Anger camera deadtime loss were investigated. These included analytic methods (mathematical modeling), the marker-source method, and a new method based on counting "pileup" events appearing in a pulse-height analyzer window positioned above the photopeak of interest. The studies were done with 99mTc on a Searle Radiographics camera with a measured deadtime of about 6 musec. Analytic methods were found to be unreliable because of unpredictable changes in deadtime with changes in radiation scattering conditions. Both the marker-source method and the pileup-counting method were found to be accurate to within a few percent for true counting rates of up to about 200 K cps, with the pileup-counting method giving better results. This finding applied to sources at depths ranging up to 10 cm of presdwood. The relative merits of the two methods are discussed.

Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference

Views: 11

Sponsor Ad

© 2024   Created by radRounds Radiology Network.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service