Imaging of renovascular hypertension: respective values of renal scintigraphy, renal Doppler US, and MR angiography.

Soulez G, Oliva VL, Turpin S, Lambert R, Nicolet V, Therasse E.
Department of Radiology, Notre-Dame Hospital, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1560 rue Sherbrooke East, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2L 4M1. gsoulez@netcom.ca

Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5):1355-68; discussion 1368-72

Renovascular hypertension affects 15%-30% of patients who have clinical criteria suggestive of renovascular disease. Noninvasive screening is crucial for patient selection prior to conventional angiography and renal revascularization. Renal scintigraphy has been reported to be sensitive for detection of renovascular hypertension, but some of its limitations (eg, in the setting of bilateral renal artery stenosis and renal failure) should be considered. Doppler ultrasonography (US) allows direct evaluation of the renal arteries as well as transrenal Doppler waveform analysis, but it remains operator dependent. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is becoming an excellent alternative to conventional angiography. The main limiting factors of this technique are inadequate visualization of segmental and accessory renal arteries as well as a tendency toward overestimation of stenoses. Given the high cost and low availability of MR angiography, scintigraphy and Doppler US should be considered the primary studies in screening for renovascular hypertension. MR angiography could be reserved for patients with inconclusive scintigraphic and Doppler US results, patients with high clinical suspicion of renovascular hypertension, and patients with a contraindication to conventional angiography.

Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference