Connecting Radiology | Enabling collaboration and professional development
Gastrointestinal examinations with digital radiography.
Takahashi M, Ueno S, Yoshimatsu S, Higashida Y, Tsuchigame T, Ito K, Hara M, Takada T, Kamiya M, Yoshida A.
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kumamoto University, Japan.
Radiographics. 1992 Sep;12(5):969-78
Basic imaging properties and clinical usefulness of an upgraded digital radiography system were evaluated. The system, which has 1,024 x 1,024 and 2,048 x 2,048 matrices, was upgraded with smaller focal spots (0.3 and 0.8 mm) and reduced thickness of the photoconductive layer of the video camera. Screen-film and digital images (with and without postprocessing) of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract were used in the clinical evaluation. Overall modulation transfer functions of the upgraded digital system were comparable to those of the screen-film system, especially at the lower spatial frequency. Threshold contrasts of the two systems were similar despite a 50% reduction in incident exposure for the digital system. For the upper GI tract, digital images processed with unsharp masking techniques were comparable in quality to screen-film images before and after upgrade of the system. For the lower GI tract, screen-film images were better than digital images, except for those produced with a 2,048 x 2,048 matrix with unsharp masking. Further evaluation of the system for examination of other parts of the body seems warranted.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kumamoto University, Japan.
Radiographics. 1992 Sep;12(5):969-78
Basic imaging properties and clinical usefulness of an upgraded digital radiography system were evaluated. The system, which has 1,024 x 1,024 and 2,048 x 2,048 matrices, was upgraded with smaller focal spots (0.3 and 0.8 mm) and reduced thickness of the photoconductive layer of the video camera. Screen-film and digital images (with and without postprocessing) of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract were used in the clinical evaluation. Overall modulation transfer functions of the upgraded digital system were comparable to those of the screen-film system, especially at the lower spatial frequency. Threshold contrasts of the two systems were similar despite a 50% reduction in incident exposure for the digital system. For the upper GI tract, digital images processed with unsharp masking techniques were comparable in quality to screen-film images before and after upgrade of the system. For the lower GI tract, screen-film images were better than digital images, except for those produced with a 2,048 x 2,048 matrix with unsharp masking. Further evaluation of the system for examination of other parts of the body seems warranted.
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Views: 5
© 2024 Created by radRounds Radiology Network.
Powered by
