Connecting Radiology | Enabling collaboration and professional development
Coronary artery imaging with multidetector CT: visualization issues.
van Ooijen PM, Ho KY, Dorgelo J, Oudkerk M.
Department of Radiology, Groningen University Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.m.a.van.ooyen@rad.azg.nl
Radiographics. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):e16. Epub 2003 Aug 7
Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries has attracted growing interest in the past few years. One of the possible acquisition techniques is multidetector computed tomography (CT) that produces large three-dimensional (3D) data sets that require visualization techniques for data evaluation. The objective of this article is to increase knowledge of possible 3D visualization techniques together with their advantages and disadvantages for the routine evaluation of cardiac data sets. Common imaging techniques available to the radiologist at standard workstations are multiplanar reformation (MPR), oblique MPR, curved MPR, maximum-intensity projection (MIP), shaded-surface display, and direct volume rendering. Each of these techniques has its advantages and disadvantages for the visualization of the coronary artery tree. Several additions to the basic techniques have been developed to overcome some of their shortcomings. Different clinical examinations, such as stent evaluation, stenosis evaluation, and bypass evaluation, require different visualization techniques. The choice of preferred technique for each clinical study depends on the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques as described in the literature. Because of the large number of possible settings and projection angles, it is important for users to interactively manipulate the images and review the whole vessel volume rather than just looking at static reformatted images. Errors such as findings of false stenoses can be avoided by means of accurate and appropriate use of software features. This requires training of users both with regard to the capabilities of the software and the background of the different techniques and their possible pitfalls. The authors believe that volume rendering of the whole heart is useful for anatomic evaluation of the coronary arteries. For more detailed observation of specific lesions, slab imaging with volume rendering or MIP is required. Copyright RSNA, 2003
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Department of Radiology, Groningen University Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.m.a.van.ooyen@rad.azg.nl
Radiographics. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):e16. Epub 2003 Aug 7
Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries has attracted growing interest in the past few years. One of the possible acquisition techniques is multidetector computed tomography (CT) that produces large three-dimensional (3D) data sets that require visualization techniques for data evaluation. The objective of this article is to increase knowledge of possible 3D visualization techniques together with their advantages and disadvantages for the routine evaluation of cardiac data sets. Common imaging techniques available to the radiologist at standard workstations are multiplanar reformation (MPR), oblique MPR, curved MPR, maximum-intensity projection (MIP), shaded-surface display, and direct volume rendering. Each of these techniques has its advantages and disadvantages for the visualization of the coronary artery tree. Several additions to the basic techniques have been developed to overcome some of their shortcomings. Different clinical examinations, such as stent evaluation, stenosis evaluation, and bypass evaluation, require different visualization techniques. The choice of preferred technique for each clinical study depends on the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques as described in the literature. Because of the large number of possible settings and projection angles, it is important for users to interactively manipulate the images and review the whole vessel volume rather than just looking at static reformatted images. Errors such as findings of false stenoses can be avoided by means of accurate and appropriate use of software features. This requires training of users both with regard to the capabilities of the software and the background of the different techniques and their possible pitfalls. The authors believe that volume rendering of the whole heart is useful for anatomic evaluation of the coronary arteries. For more detailed observation of specific lesions, slab imaging with volume rendering or MIP is required. Copyright RSNA, 2003
Posted via PubMed for educational and discussion purposes only.
Link to PubMed Reference
Views: 1
© 2024 Created by radRounds Radiology Network.
Powered by
